I. P. Chupina, d.e.n., professor Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo Universiteta
E. V. Zarubina, k.f.n., dotsent Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo Universiteta
N. N. Simachkova, k.i.n., dotsent Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo Universiteta
In recent years, the state administration has been de-ecologized: state support for environmental protection has decreased, and permanent reorganizations (accompanied by a reduction in the status and number of staff and budget funding) have put the state system of nature protection in a critical position. The continuation of this process really threatens the destruction of environmental structures. The current state of the environment is characterized by a transition to a global consideration of issues of the subject. The relevance of this work is due, on the one hand, to the great interest in the topic in modern science, on the other hand, its lack of development, as well as attention to the environment in the modern world. The concept of global environmental security is not yet clearly defined. In a broad sense, security is the ability to withstand threats to life, health, well-being, basic human rights, livelihoods, and the social order.
References
1.Baydakov S. L. Litsenzirovanie kak pravovoe sredstvo regulirovaniya prirodopolzovaniya i ohrany okruzhayuschey sredy // Pravovoe obespechenie ohrany okruzhayuschey sredy i ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti: Ucheb.-prakt. posobie - M., KNORUS, 2016. S.55. 2. Bogolyubov S. A. Pravovaya zaschita rossiyskih prirodnyh resursov// Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2015. # 12. S.14 – 16. 3. Vishnyakov YA. D. Ekologicheskaya i promyshlennaya bezopasnost gorno-metallurgicheskogo kompleksa // Ekologiya i promyshlennost Rossii. 2018. # 10. C. 46 - 50. 4. Shemshuchenko YU.S. Natsionalnye interesy i ekologicheskoe pravo// Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2018. # 12. S.78 – 79.
