B. A. Voronin, doktor yuridicheskih nauk, professor,
I. P. Chupina, doktor ekonomicheskih nauk, professor,
YA. V. Voronina, starshiy prepodavatel,
YU. N. Chupin, aspirant
UrGAU.
Agriculture, unlike other industries, has its own specifics. Here you can see a close intertwining of technical and technological, socio-economic and natural-biological processes. A distinctive feature of this industry is the use of land as the main means of production. Land differs significantly from other means of production. These differences are as follows. First, the earth is a product of nature. By contrast, other means of production are the result of human activity. Currently, people can already create artificial soils in the form of hydroponics, when the roots of plants are fixed in some solid substrate (sand, gravel, etc.), where the nutrient solution is supplied. However, the share of agricultural products grown using hydroponics is a tiny amount. Another feature of agricultural production is less, compared with other sectors of the economy, commodity production. A significant part of their production remains in agricultural enterprises, but comes to the market and used as means of production. Another feature of agricultural production is the slow turnover of labour. The fact is that many types of labor in agriculture are used only for a short period of time.
References:
1. Voronin B. A., Hannanov R. A., Hannanova T. R. Novye kontseptualnye osnovy obespecheniya ustoychivosti agrarnogo proizvodstva // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2012. # 6 (98). S. 81-89. 2. Voronin B. A., Fateeva N. B. Gosudarstvennaya politika v agrarnoy sfere Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2014. # 7 (125). S. 84-87. 3. Voronin B. A. Agrarnaya pravovaya nauka Rossii // Agrarnoe i zemelnoe pravo. 2005. # 1. S. 21-26. 4. Donnik I. M., Voronin B. A. Napravleniya razvitiya agrarnoy ekonomiki v sovremennoy Rossii // Agrarnoe i zemelnoe pravo. 2015. # 11 (141). S. 62-65. 5. Zagaytov I.B. Ekonomicheskie problemy povysheniya ustoychivosti selskohozyaystvennogo proizvodstva. M.: Ekonomika, 2014. 239 s. 6. Inshakov O.V. Mehanizm sotsialno-rynochnoy transformatsii i ustoychivogo razvitiya APK Rossii. Volgograd: Izd-vo Volgogradskogo gos. universiteta. 2015. 450 s. 7. Kastornov N.P. Mehanizm nalogooblozheniya v sisteme gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya APK // Ekonomika selskohozyaystv. i pererab. predpriyatiy. 2017. # 3. S.46-48. 8. Ksenofontov M.YU. Vozmozhnye stsenarii razvitiya APK Rossii // Ekonomika selskohozyaystvennyh i pererabatyvayuschih predpriyatiy. 2015. # 5. S. 13-17. 9. Chupina I. P. Mnogoukladnaya ekonomika kak perspektivnaya forma hozyaystvovaniya v sisteme prodovolstvennogo samoobespecheniya industrialnyh regionov // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2012. # 6. S. 116-120. 10. Chupina I. P. Sovremennoe sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe polozhenie agrarnyh predpriyatiy regiona // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2011. # 4. S.107-109. 11. Chupina I. P. Sozdanie sistemy antikrizisnogo upravleniya v selskohozyaystvennoy organizatsii // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2017. # 8 (162). S. 95-100. 12. Chupina I. P. Rol gosudarstva v protsesse importozamescheniya. V sbornike: The Elev-enth International Conference on Economic Sciences. 2016. S. 22 - 25. 13. Qiao J., Yu D., Wang Q. et al. Diverse effects of crop distribution and climate change on crop production in the agropastoral transitional zone of China // FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE. Vol. 12. Iss. 2. Pp.: 408-419. Published: JUN 2018.
